Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.productbrain.com/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

Kano classification describes the market maturity tier of an approach. It answers: what level of satisfaction is this bet targeting?

The three tiers

Must-have

Table stakes. Causes dissatisfaction if absent, no delight if present. Users expect this — they won’t thank you for it, but they’ll leave without it. Examples: Basic authentication, terms of service page, data export, error messages.

Incremental

More is better — each improvement adds proportional value. The user notices and appreciates each step up, but there’s no surprise. Examples: Faster load times, more storage, better search results, self-serve billing.

Delighter

Unexpected and disproportionately satisfying. Users didn’t know they wanted this. When it lands, it generates word-of-mouth and loyalty. Examples: AI-assisted planning, proactive coaching, one-click import from existing tools.

The car window example

The classic Kano illustration: car windows.
  • Must-have: The window opens and closes (manual crank)
  • Incremental: Power windows (each car gets them, each is a step up)
  • Delighter: Auto-close on rain detection (nobody expected it, everyone loves it)
Over time, delighters become must-haves. Power windows were a delighter in the 1980s. Today, a car without them fails as a must-have.

Why it matters for planning

A healthy product has a mix of all three tiers:
  • Early stage: Cover must-haves first, then sprinkle delighters to differentiate. Skip incremental — you don’t have enough users for linear improvements to matter.
  • Growth stage: Backfill incremental improvements. Your must-haves work, your delighters attracted users, now the incremental work retains them.
  • Mature stage: Must-haves are commoditized, incremental is the baseline. New delighters are your competitive edge.
Kano classification helps you see this balance. If all your approaches are must-have, you’re building table stakes but not differentiating. If they’re all delighters, you’re innovating but might be missing fundamentals.

Where Kano lives

Kano is set on approaches, not needs. The same need can have approaches at different tiers — that’s the whole point. A need like “users can compare prices” might have a must-have approach (manual entry), an incremental approach (barcode scan), and a delighter approach (AI prediction from photos).